When the
Reserves Slow Down: The Rupee’s Hidden Struggles
Referenced Article
Title: Sri
Lanka central bank buys US$781mn less to August 2025 than last year
Published on: 15
September 2025
Source: Economy
Next
Author: Economy
Next News Desk
The foreign exchange (FX) market is at the heart of global
trade and finance. It is where currencies are traded, exchange rates are
determined, and confidence in a country's financial system is tested on a daily
basis. In Sri Lanka, the Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL) is at the central of
this market selling and buying US dollars to manage liquidity and build
reserves.
But in 2025, official data tell a story of slowdown: the CBSL
has been buying fewer dollars this year compared to last. What does this mean
for the rupee, and why should we care?
The
Figures Behind the News
In August 2025, the CBSL purchased US$142.5 million from
commercial banks, states EconomyNext. Over the eight months of January to
August, the total figure is approximately US$1,238.6 million
Here's the catch: for the duration of the same period last
year, the CBSL had purchased over US$2020.4 million. That means in 2025, the
bank has purchased down by US$781 million. This is a decrease of nearly 40%.
At first glance, this is a small accounting change. But it's
not an oversight or a flaw in the market. It's a conscious policy choice. In
the FX world, it's a red flag.
The drop in dollar purchases reflects two distinct monetary
periods:
- · 2024: The CBSL pursued deflationary policy drawing money tight to hold down inflation and stabilize the currency. This allowed aggressive dollar construction without stimulating price pressures.
- · 2025: The central bank has been trending towards accommodative operations, including open market activities that actually infuse liquidity into the system.
This change is linked with a revival in private credit a
positive sign for growth but a complication for reserve accumulation.
The Debate
on Sterilization: Is Unsterilized Purchase a mistake?
One of the most significant technical shifts was in 2025: the
CBSL's dollar purchases are no longer sterilized. That is, the rupees injected
into the system when purchasing dollars are no longer matched by the sale of
government securities.
Why it matters:
Supporters maintain unsterilized purchases simplify reserve
accumulation and reduce interest costs. But critics warn the move poses a
threat to inflation and exchange rate pressure especially if liquidity
expansion is not supported by deflationary restraint.
The action has been dubbed a "mistake" by one
analyst quoted in the report. If money supply expands too rapidly, the
resulting inflation could undermine the very stability the reserves are
intended to ensure
The
Current Account Conundrum
The 2025 experience discredits the simplistic belief that
"current account deficits lead to currency depreciation." Even when
Sri Lanka had a surplus, the rupee depreciated.
This undermines an earlier belief by the majority of
mainstream economists that current account deficits are the primary source of
currency weakness. It suggests monetary policy credibility and not trade
balances could be the actual pillar of exchange rate stability.
As EconomyNext’ columnist Bellwether argues:“Blaming current account deficits is a
convenient excuse for the macroeconomist to escape accountability.”
History's
Warning: Are We Repeating the Same Mistakes?
The monetary history offers a sobering lesson. The Central
Bank of Ceylon, the predecessor of the CBSL, retained stability for its initial
18 months through deflationary policy. That discipline was soon lost,
establishing decades of crisis on an episodic basis.
Now, with Sri Lanka navigating the later stages of an IMF
program, the risk is increasing. The report warns:
“That is
why in the latter stages of a 4-year IMF program now some countries miss
targets and there are street riots as currencies slide again.”
The drop in dollar purchases can be more than a strategic
choice it can be a sign of the same institutional habits that caused previous
failures.
Personal
Analysis
In my perspective, the CBSL's reduction by $781 million of
dollar buying is much more than a shift in reserve accumulation approach. In my
view, the central bank is trying to do two difficult things at the same time.
On the one hand, the central bank is trying to stimulate economic growth by
allowing more liquidity into the banking system. on the contrary, it must guard
against reigniting inflation or devaluing the rupee.
What impresses me is the unsterilized nature of recent
interventions. While the policy has the benefit of keeping reserve accumulation
low and reducing near-term fiscal burdens, it is fraught with the risk of
stimulating money supply growth at a moment when private credit is on the rise.
Such may create a vicious feedback process increased liquidity could create
import demand, which would squeeze the current account, and even lead to rupee
weakening just what reserve accumulation is attempting to prevent.
I also find the disconnect between currency performance and
current account surpluses particularly interesting. It contradicts the received
wisdom that it is trade balances that determine a country's currency strength.
Rather, it highlights the significance of monetary credibility the confidence
the market places in the central bank sticking to price stability. Without this
confidence, even a surplus will not protect the rupee from weakness.
History is heavy in this instance. Sri Lanka's monetary
institutions have a long tradition of prioritizing short-run growth over
long-run stability, time and again with dire consequences. That the CBSL is
being faced with this choice again during an IMF program and fragile public
confidence suggests that structural drivers of monetary instability cut very
deep.
In my view, the CBSL's current strategy is between a rock and
a hard place. If applied with accuracy, it may help recovery without
undermining stability. But if there is lack of discipline, Sri Lanka may end up
doing things all over again where good intentions resulted in inflation,
currency depreciation, and street unrest. The next few months will be the
moment of truth for whether or not the central bank is able to break this
cycle.
✍️ Written by: Divya
Nethranjali
📅 Published
on: September 19, 2025
_1LwJClMHK1.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment